“Emily’s Law” Moves Forward in Minnesota

The Minnesota House Public Safety and Civil Justice Committee held a hearing yesterday to consider the so-called “Emily’s Law” (HF699), which would lower the age of adult certification for violent juvenile offenses to 13.

The bill is named after Emily Johnson, a 2-year-old who, in June 2006, was sexually assaulted and killed by the 13-year-old son of her daycare provider in Fergus Falls. As this report from Minnesota public radio explains, Emily’s parents are vocal supporters of the bill, which is sponsored by Republican State Representatives Bud Nornes and Torrey Westrom.

Minnesota law, Lynn Johnson testified yesterday, should have allowed for that 13-year-old to be tried as an adult. “Why is our daughter laying in the ground and this person is in a group home?” she asked.

Emily’s father, Travis, who also testified, recited a list of states where juveniles can be tried as adults at ages younger than 14, the current cutoff in Minnesota. “In Kansas and Vermont, it’s 10. In Missouri and Colorado, it’s 12,” he said. “Why must the brain be fully developed before one is held accountable for his actions?”

Well, see, that’s a very good question. And if the committee members were interested in–or persuaded by–the answer, they might not have voted 12 to 6 in favor of the bill. Unfortunately, the testimonies of Washington County Attorney Doug Johnson (no relation, I assume) and psychologist Sue Foss, both of whom argued against passage, did not hold sway. The bill now moves forward to the House Finance Committee and, if it passes again, on to the House floor.


3 responses to ““Emily’s Law” Moves Forward in Minnesota

  1. I believe the law shouldn’t be pass i mean if it doesn’t matter whether the mind has compeletly developed or not does that mean we should also start trying the mentally ill if they commit such crimes. this law will only lead to worse things down the road.

  2. I think that it is unreasonable to think that kids of the age 7 and older dont know right from wrong. when are people going to realize that we are enabling our kids to get away with these types of crimes. where is the world headed???????

  3. I guess I just don’t get it, what has happened here? This “person ??” rapes and murders an INNOCENT!!! two year old baby girl, and yet is still allowed to walk around FREELY, as if nothing happened?? He should be in jail for the rest of his life!!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s