No Charges for MySpace Suicide

Some of you may have been following the curious story about Megan Meier, a 13-year-old girl who committed suicide last year after receiving insulting messages on MySpace from “Josh,” who turned out to be an 18-year-old woman trying to glean information from Megan about a neighbor’s daughter. (Got all that?)

This “cautionary tale” of “cyberbullying in the suburbs” made the rounds toward the end of November and made good fodder for national news broadcasters, who were quick to warn parents to be vigilant and eager to put Megan’s grieving parents on the screen but not quite as interested in sorting out the legal and ethical questions that the case raised. Consider this exchange, excerpted from an interview with Ron and Tina Meier on the ABC morning news:

ABC: “I know it’s difficult to talk about all this. We hear about kids cyberbullying, bullying each other online, but this was a parent bullying your daughter, pretending to be someone else. Why would she do that?”

Tina Meier: “We don’t know. How do you get in the mind of somebody that–you just have no idea. We have no answer for that.

ABC: Do you think her daughter put her up to it and wanted to know more about your daughter?

Tina Meier: No.

Ron Meier: Everything that we found out so far–it was the sole idea of the mother.

ABC: Do you hold her responsible for the death of your daughter?

Tina Meier: Absolutely.

Ron: Yes, I believe they were the ones that took her to the edge of the cliff and gave her the nudge to go over.

The segment included no comment from a legal expert, who could have pointed to the high standard of culpability the Meiers’ prosecutor would have to meet and could have informed a broader discussion about harassment in cyberspace. In the absence of any real thinking on the subject, naturally, emotion won the day: in this case, Megan’s parents’ desire for vengeance went unchallenged.

As it turns out, though, they don’t have a case. According to this CNN report, the Meiers’ attorney will not be pressing charges. “There is no way that anybody could know that talking to someone or saying that you’re mean to your friends on the Internet would create a substantial risk,” prosecuting attorney Jack Banas said. “It certainly created a potential risk and, unfortunately for the Meiers, that potential became reality. But under the law we just couldn’t show that.”

I certainly don’t defend the neighbor or her 18-year-old accomplice; my point is not to rush to their side. What they did was reprehensible and callous and mean. I feel bad for the Meiers; I feel like they are justified in seeking retribution for what happened to Megan. But that’s just it: when it comes to meting out punishment, feelings should be subservient to the law. You don’t often get that perspective from the nightly news or from victims’ rights partisans or–and here’s my point–from the antibullying campaigns, which typically call for an aggressive approach to punishing schoolyard thugs. What you get instead is an emotional appeal measured not by legal precedent or smart policy but by sympathy votes.

It’s a no-brainer to condemn bullies. But we should use our brains when considering how to hold them accountable for what they do.


2 responses to “No Charges for MySpace Suicide

    Fits one of the criminal profiles mentioned there also some of the messages were of a sexual nature and shouldnt drew be facing charges for that.

  2. While the Megan Meier case seems outrageous and unique, it isn’t unique. Hundreds of cases of egregious and heinous acts go on every day with the same excuses out of our lawmakers.

    One such other case….The case of Nikki Catsouras, is a classic example of disgusting, hateful activity against innocent victims, while our lawmakers excuse themselves from enacting laws to prevent this.

    The excuse lawmakers use to let themselves off the hook stem from the growth of the Internet and how fast it’s changing. This is a sham.

    Chat rooms, message boards, instant messengers and email have been in existence for far over a decade now. While the software used to transmit messages changes slightly, the basic essence of using the Internet to send a message is largely the same. Is a decade or two long enough to establish some basic decency laws in regards to Internet usage?

    I’ve posted the Nikki Catsouras story along with many details about the Megan Meier case so the inactivity out of our lawmakers towards these types of cases can be clearly seen.

    Those who are interested in learning about cases like Megan’s and Nikki’s case are encouraged to drop by and comment on them if you like. I have a couple of polls set up as well. Danny Vice would like to hear your point of view.

    Public awareness of the problem and discussions about possible solutions are the best way to pressure elected officials into action instead of excuse making.

    I invite you to come by and share your opinion.

    Danny Vice

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s