Morton West Postmortem

Some of you may have noticed that Ellen, a reader who blogs at Minivan Diaries, left a thoughtful comment on my recent post about the student protest at Morton West High School. She rightly asks,

Why doesn’t anybody seem unnerved by the fact that the principal, superintendent and guidance counselors took it upon themselves to decide who should be given lesser punishments (ie athletes and college bound students), that kids were asked to “finger” leaders in exchange for “a better deal”, and some more fortunate parents were notified of the incident and told if they picked up their kids by a certain time, there would only be suspensions? Is this uneven justice acceptable by the very individuals who these kids rely on as role models?

“I have been following the blogs and media ever since,” Ellen concludes, “and nobody seems too bothered by this. Why not?”

I, too, was startled by the administration’s selective punishments when I first read about the protest, and I wrote about it, albeit briefly, in a pop quiz-like post here. Ellen wrote at greater length and with particular attention to this aspect of the story when it broke–you can read her thoughts here.

As to why others in the blogosphere and the media failed to highlight that angle, I can’t say for certain. But I suspect that newsroom judgment rather than indifference led the writers and editors to lead with the students’ dissent over the war and the parents’ outrage at the threatened expulsions. The officials’ manipulation of the top students is relevant, and surely troubling, but it’s less newsworthy than the fact that the protest was being criminalized. I would also add that the information was included in most of the news stories I read on this incident, though tucked into later paragraphs. We wouldn’t have known about the selectivity of the punishments if the media hadn’t brought it to our attention in the first place.


One response to “Morton West Postmortem

  1. Thank-you for attempting to answer my question. Your observations I am sure are absolutely correct and without a doubt the issues that the media chose to raise are not only more newsworthy but also have much greater implications to our society as a whole. I just find these “minor” nuances more prevalent these days — this notion that those in charge feel they are granted some “special rights” to do what they think may be in the best interest of either themselves (ie wanting to be sure that there college admission statistics are presentable) or what they believe to be in the best interest of others while there may be no grounds to believe so. I am not sure why it seems to have become acceptable.

    …and I went to your pop quiz – glad you raised the issues as well. Maybe dialogue is the best we can hope for….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s